I also feel that the ninja-star may funkify the bokeh a bitgive it a touch of painterly magicbut that may just be meand this wild opinion is something I may need to test out a bit more! Like ZF/ZEs, they have fantastic barrel rotations (often 180 degrees or more). Would I be crazy to say I kinda prefer my 85mm f2.8 to my 85mm f1.4. Contax are by no means the only cool, vintage kids on the block. For example, the 200 3.5 Tessar was "updated" with a Sonnar 180 2.8. In fact, i'm almost considering selling my 85mm f1.4 for that reason. People (me included) didn't like the poor performance of the Canon EF wide lenses and the 21mm and 28mm 2.8 Contax lenses filled the gap. Check it out: Copyright 2007-2022. The Canon EOS R10 is compact, mid-level 24MP APS-C mirrorless camera built around Canon's RF mount. Building this set was a great experience throughout. I was not impressed, so I decided to make my own. Contax have a bit less contrast, and flare more. Brilliant job Nick. I was just ahead of the game, so it wasnt necessary on my case. Great help. For a little over a year, this was enough. The process turned out alright and the gears worked great, but later on I learned some useful tricks. The process turned out alright and the gears worked great, but later on I learned some useful tricks. Each page with eight stickers costed me about $10. The 135mm f/2.8 was a great lens. Are not only the slowest, but frequently the most classic. This page was generated at 05:50 PM. This one was only made in Japan and it doesnt exist in AE, just MM. Copyright 2007-2022. It had five lenses: 28/2.8, 35/2.8, 50/1.4, 85/1.4 and 135/2.8. This makes life easier when grabbing gear to go out and renting it as well. On my set some were MMJ, others AEG. check out the. I have used the Nikon 85 1.4, Sony Carl Zeiss 85 and 135, Mino 85, Sigma 85, Canon 85 1.2 for reference. Well done mate. Because the wides are slow, you will almost certainly need to compliment your kit with a Tokina/Duclos 11-16 2.8. Tito Ferradans spent the last six years researching, writing and making videos about the anamorphic format and how to achieve it without breaking the bank on low-budget productions. Page of 321. 2023 All rights reserved. Its history criss-crosses wars, politics, and conjures up the never-ending battles between Leica and Zeiss. (Nick hope you don't mind my piggy-back!). Its awesome Western Zeiss glass. You have a wide range of lenses to pick from and equally different price tags. Its agreed that MM lenses perform better and have cleaner results than AE lenses, theyre also less prone to flaring. The questions get dizzying. Otherwise, you should notice no optical or mechanical difference between the two lines. I don't want to feed your addiction or be your pusher or cause a break-up in your marriage or relationship but KEH has a "like new" 21/2.8 Distagon for $1,950.00. In this guest post, Vancouverbasedfreelance filmmaker and an anamorphic lens freak TitoFerradans,is exposing us to hisContax Zeiss CineTune-Up Guide. RED V-RAPTOR 8K VV Lab Test: Rolling Shutter, Dynamic Range and Latitude plus Video! What IS the Ninja-Star? Not too sure but it seems likely. Finally found the old MTF charts for each of the Zeiss Contax lenses. I was not impressed, so I decided to make my own. Blackmagic Forum View topic - CONTAX Zeiss lenses | BMPCC 6K Its the one I always took with me and it gave me gorgeous shots. Or do what I did and find an affordable Standard Prime 16mm T2. The lenses were made in two generations. Contax/Yashica Lenses - Which are the best? - FM Forums Contax Zeiss Survival Guide - REDUSER.net https://www.reduser.net/forum/shooting-red/lens-tests/94346-contax-zeiss-survival-guide. Originally launched in 1932 as a rangefinder system to compete with - you guessed it. First I measured the slip-on caps I got from SIMMOD and created a Photoshop template with that size. Proof of this is that arguably their most famous lensthe 21was ONLY made in Japan. Its been there for quite a while and I have checked up on it countless times to help me make decisions. Whenever I started thinking the Soviet lenses were sharp, Id pop one of the Contax on the camera and stare in awe. Its by no means unusable, but dont expect a Contax at F2 to perform like an Ultraprime. ----------------------------------------------------------, Oh, just to add I was watching the BBC drama 'Ripper Street' last night when I noticed a couple of shots with fairly extreme ninja star bokeh No technical information on IMDB as to what it was shot on/with sadly but you never knwo. Certainly sharper than both its larger brothers, the 100 planar and 100 Macro. Old against New: Zeiss 2.8/28 vs Sony FE 2/28 vs Minolta MC 2/28 Expect there to be bidding wars on eBay now, the gates of CONTAX HELL have been unleashed. This will ensure a constant outside diameter, which means you dont have to adjust your follow focus every time you change lenses. My favorite lens switched to the 85/1.4 after that, though. On almost all shoots weve done with Contax lenses, where we have used other glass, be it Leica Rs or Canon EOS, every time the DP has noticed that the waveforms jump. D) They are very easy to adapt to EOS mount. I personally own the 35mm and the 50mm. Thats NOT to say all the designs are the same. I then redesigned and printed new focus gears for these and ordered more Leitax mounts and that was good for another five months. B) They share very similar designs as the ZF/ZE/CP2 lenses, but for or the price. If you dont want to deal with that, hunt for MMs. It looked neat, but from my experiences as 2nd Assistant Camera, I was constantly being asked how fast so-and-so lens was, or whats its minimum focus. The last decision I had to make was between the 18mm f/4 and the 15mm f/3.5. The 60/2.8 AE can do 1:1 magnification, while the MM can only reach 1:2. I know a bunch of photo magazines back in the 90's and early 2000's did comprehensive tests and reviews of Contax, I wonder if they lifted the numbers from one of those? However, I wont argue that having a lens that says Made In West Germany is wicked cool. I went for the fastest lenses and snuffed out the AEGs I had, in favor of the prettier bokeh of the MMJs. It was, perhaps, the first standard zoom of truly decent quality throughout its range. I almost went for the wrong one with my MM obsession, but I was warned by my followers on Instagram about the edge the AE had over the MM. Want regular CineD updates about news, reviews, how-tos and more?Sign up to our newsletter and we will give you just that. The 50 should be among the easiest to get right because the optical path is among the simplest. I met amazing businesses with folks that really know how to deal with their customers, I did try out mindblowing glass and I was humbled by all the feedback I got when asking questions about what would be my best options in the middle of the process and posting updates of what I was working on. Wide open the 1.4 is great, but the focusing ring just feels very clunky on my copy. Only correction I did to this photograph was to increase RAW color temperature, that's it. But dont expect them to have the even performance of a set of Ultraprimes or Masterprimes (where many of the primes are not only similar in size and weight, but also perform similarly at matching T stops!). E) They are very easy to cinemod. Another trick is to heat them up with a blow dryer or even your house heater. If you are not great at DIY, make sure to check out our sponsors SimmodLens and FollowFocusGears.com for pretty much all the mods mentioned in the article above. Heres the answer to all of this, broken down. They dilate quite a bit and fit much more easily. I remember someone doing a test a when the epic first came with stills lenses and noticed it too. DPReview TV: Nikon 58mm F0.95 Noct Review! It had five lenses: 28/2.8, 35/2.8, 50/1.4, 85/1.4 and 135/2.8. 300 g Possibilities of combining Carl Zeiss lenses with Mutarconverters for use with the ContaxSLR camera system Carl Zeiss Photoobjektive D-73446 Oberkochen Telephone (07364) 20-6175 Fax (07364) 20-4045 eMail: photo@zeiss.de http://www.zeiss.de Contax 100mm f/2 vs ZE/ZF - FM Forums check out the. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment . The main difference being that a normal human can afford Contax Zeiss but not Leicas. Filter. Vintage Lenses Recommendation (Contax Yashica, Canon FD, Minolta MD You could use it an any focal length and not really have any compromise relative the prime lenses of the time. Conveniently for me as I was finishing the set, SIMMOD Lens came into the picture, with very competitive prices, impressive customer service and super high-quality products. But then work started picking up and I saw that as the perfect opportunity to upgrade. Also, Super Speeds are a 1.2/1.4 at 18mm and 25mm. So I sand the inside down a bit and try again. The 15mm is a gorgeous rectilinear super wide angle, it shares the same optical formula as the Leica Super-Elmar 15mm f/3.5, with different coatings. Finally completed my set of modified Contax Zeiss lenses. All Time Today Last Week Last Month. They rack focus beautifully. You can use the code CINE at check out for a nifty discount! Related Topics . The one main difference I can see isas stated aboveI think the Contaxes cinemod slightly BETTER than ZF/ZEs (because they ALL focus the right way, and ALL have an aperture ring), and also ALL they have that wonderful older T* coating that I believe looks better on digital than the newer T* coating (renders more organically). Because Contax is actually one of the most storied names in photography. Here are some things I got from it: Contax Zeiss lenses were designed for 35mm full frame, which means theyll cover all the way up to Vistavision sensors on modern cameras and anything smaller. Eventually will spring for 135/2.8. I went for the fastest lenses and snuffed out the AEGs I had, in favor of the prettier bokeh of the MMJs. If you dont have a 3d-printer, Im selling all the gears I made for my set on eBay! My favorite lens switched to the 85/1.4 after that, though. I would take Contax Zeiss over Canon "Cine Primes," Zeiss Compact Primes, or the new "Superspeeds" any day. If you want to get in the same room and do a test to compare the 50/1.4 to a ZE/ZF, I'd be more than willing; just shoot me a line. Next up was the 35mm, two stops faster at f/1.4. I will leave you with a few beautiful videos that will definitely help you make up your mind! These are way more common in AE, but I was lucky enough to find a MM coming straight from Japan. Thank you! DaVinci Resolve Quick Tip What Are Power Bins and Why Are They So Useful? The optics in these Zeiss are very similar, if not the same as the current Zeiss still lenses, a different coating on the glass is the main difference. Ron also offers the full mod service for great prices, including focus gears and lens mounts. So I figured I would write up a little CONTAX SURVIVAL GUIDE that tries to answer them all at once Contax Zeiss should be on your radar for a couple of reasons. I'm thinking about a Contax tele, such as the 180/2.8 Sonnar. I took this question to Instagram again and got really good arguments for both sides. You know, like a cine lens! Plus, fitting these is never a one-slip move. AE vs MM? Here are some things I got from it: Contax Zeiss lenses were designed for 35mm full frame, which means theyll cover all the way up to Vistavision sensors on modern cameras and anything smaller. Back to the story. I needed the one extra stop of light though, for consistent f/2 or faster through the main set. Is the Distagon 21mm the same glass as they use in the Compact Primes? Contax Zeiss 60mm f/2.8 Macro AEG: Infinity focus on the left, minimum focus on the right. An instant hit, it became synonymous with innovation. I'm only saying that because the guys on the photography forums use these charts to compare numbers with other lenses they all refer to that page as the 'source'. For me the 35mm F/1.4 has become a go to lens while working as a DP. I still dont know when to use them, though! The downside of such magnification is that the focus ring travels a lot, pretty much doubling the physical length of the lens. Still on the DIY train, a friend and I had just bought a 3d-printer, so I started making my own focus gears. X. X. On my set some were MMJ, others AEG. This turns the original C/Y mount into a solid EF mount that wont budge for nothing. 250 g approx. 28mm comparison: 28/2.8 on the left, 28/2.0 Hollywood on the right. Contax Zeiss Survival Guide In reply to Giovanni_1968 9 months ago While this site is targeted to adapting Zeiss Contax lenses for video, it also seems to be the go-to guide for the rest of us with respect to these lenses. These I ordered from MOO, because they offered me more variety at a much lower price. After I got the five Contax I went to look for more info and found Nick Morrison's Contax Zeiss Survival Guide at REDUser. I prefer the C/Ys but since I already own 3 FDs (cheap ones: 28 2.8, 50 1.8 and 135 2.8), I'm leaning towards the latter, although still undecided. Still on the DIY train, a friend and I had just bought a 3d-printer, so I started making my own focus gears. I am thinking of selling the lenses we tested together. Never been an issue for us - and truth be told, if I have a problem with a lens, Id send it to Duclos anywaybut be advised. 77mm front. The rubber grip on the focus ring of the lenses is awesome because it prevents the gears from sliding, but its also a pain because it makes the fitting a lot harder. 80mm diameter Cine rings by SIMMOD Lens and 77mm filter threads. Theres a lot of discussion whether the 135mm f/2.0 has a clear advantage over the f/2.8, especially when you take into account the price difference. Canon FD's are the predecessors to Canon L glass, and have a superb pedigree. Having them separate also gives me versatility on pricing, since the main set can still go out without them for a more accessible price. This gave me a great set of lenses ready for action, all I missed was a way of getting them to said action. It's cheapass ones I got from China. All times are GMT-8. AE lenses were made between 1975 and 1984. They have a pleasing organic rendering that is not dissimilar to Contax. 06-22-2022, 04:47 PM Hey, everybody, I know we have the awesome Contax Zeiss Survival Guide but looking at building a set of Zeiss lenses myself from bargain finds and fixer uppers I've collected, I wondered what anybody's experiences might have been with mixing Zeiss lineups together? I have a mixed set and barely notice the difference. Shervin, thank you so much for posting those R3ds. I then redesigned and printed new focus gears for these and ordered more Leitax mounts and that was good for another five months. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. I also added the f-stop for each lens and its minimum focus in meters and feet. For that reason I had to make a super tall focus gear that would not slip off when travelling from infinity to minimum focus. Pm for pics. The 15mm is a gorgeous rectilinear super wide angle, it shares the same optical formula as the Leica Super-Elmar 15mm f/3.5, with different coatings. Really haven't tested it enough, but the color rendering of the 85mm f2.8 really seems to have some special magic. Things can still look beautiful, but Zeisss philosophy is not to make things pretty, but to be true. Impressive performance and also the fastest 35mm I ever owned. Its also a big change in size and weight, almost doubling its predecessor. The only thing I could maybe do later is update the markings on each lens with fluorescent paint like what you see here, by Moritz Schierenbeck on VLFVs facebook group. Heres a very interesting article by Edward T. that summarizes tech papers published on these designs and their differences, pros and cons. The more opinions you have, the less you see. VLFV family also gets 10% off any order you make with this companies, just add a promo code VLFV (SimmodLens) or VINTAGE (FollowFocusGears.com) on checkout. Fairly "affordable" as well. My copy has some fungus in it and other copies might be better. Used it today on my 5D to keep things lightweight. For those not wanting to go the 'pro' Cine-Mod route, you can do it yourself with decent results. These lenses thread the fine line between organic and sharp, a line as thin as depth of field on an 85/1.2 wide open, only second to Leica. But then work started picking up and I saw that as the perfect opportunity to upgrade. AgThunderbird A7Riii | A7ii infrared mod | Minolta 7 . Yes, its one step slower than the its siblings, but it definitely crushes them with razor sharp focus and a beautiful transition into bokeh. Thanks for the advice nick. If thats your deal, then you will love Leica Rs. Are often more traditional designs. First I measured the slip-on caps I got from SIMMOD and created a Photoshop template with that size. makes SPECTACULAR permanent mounts for $75 (Duclos uses these, nuff said). In Contax, that corresponds to all lenses 35mm and wider (down to 15mm). Anyone who tells you otherwise is full of shit. We noticed this specifically on a shoot where we mixed Leica Rs and Contaxs, and the Contaxs def gave us about a stop extra in latitude. That said, many still photographers (and DPs) have gotten magic out of these lenses at an F2 or faster. Last point on the focus gears: the same way you always want to have a constant outside diameter, you want to place them on the lenses at the same distance from the mount. I prefer it, cuz theres an honesty there I appreciate. This page was generated at 05:50 PM. So Contax = Western Zeiss. I think its safe to say all these lenses from this era of Zeiss optics have remarkably similar coatings and magic. Note: My hunch on the latitude/low con deal is as follows. It was the most expensive lens in the set and it shares a lot of the beautiful look of the 28/2 Hollywood. I know I stopped mentioning how sharp these lenses are, but the 60mm is worth highlighting. Great post about contax!

Houses For Rent Biddeford Maine, National High School Chess Championship, Articles C